| Explanation of Data (15%) |
Poor description of data, Variables not properly explained |
Explanation mostly correct, analysis strategy makes sense given this
explanation |
Explanation entirely correct; variables properly discussed,
motivation for choosing data set is clear |
| Correctness of Code and Output (30%) |
Fundamental flaws in code, errors when executing it OR important
parts are missing |
R-Code is complete and renders mostly correct results |
R-Code is entirely correct, the output is always correct |
| Interpretation of Results and Explanation of Approach (30%) |
Interpretation missing or flawed, approach is not plausible or does
not match interpretation |
Interpretation is mostly sound and makes sense given chosen
approach, only small mistakes |
Interpretation goes beyond describing results, meaningful
explanations without missing important aspects |
| Clarity of Code (15%) |
Inconsistent or incomprehensible code OR not reproducible! |
Clear code with only negligble inconsistencies, reproducible with
only minor changes |
Consistent, clear, reproducible code that runs without any
adjustments |
| Layout (10%) |
Unclear layout, missing elements, no structure |
Layout is mostly clear and concise, no central elements are
missing |
Layout clean and consistent, only relevant output, but no important
elements missing |